Transvaginal mesh is the medical device that would be implanted into the vagina of females in order to treat the conditions of weakened and damaged tissues. These meshes also find their uses in the treatment of various other conditions also. These kinds of medical implants are becoming popular for various treatments in female patients in the developing world. These are considered to be the medical devices as they are to be implanted into the woman’s body under the anesthetic.
Mesh Implants are medical devices that would be implanted into the vagina of women that could be used for repairing both the weakened as well as the damaged tissues. Most generally, making use of the porous synthetic materials that can be either absorbable or non-absorbable would make up these implants. Sometimes, using the biological materials that are absorbable can make these implants.
Materials used to produce the transvaginal mesh
The transvaginal mesh implants are manufactured using various kinds of synthetic and biological materials. These materials are porous in nature which would be containing numerous tiny holes that will allow the tissues of our body to be grown into the transvaginal mesh. The synthetic materials may be absorbable or non absorbable while the biological materials would be absorbable. The transvaginal mesh would be acting as the framework for providing the essential support. The transvaginal meshes will be looking similar to the slings or the hammocks. During the implantation, the incisions would be made inside of the vagina and the tissues that are supporting the vagina would be given the necessary strengths with the help of stitches. These implants are considered to be permanent.
Manufacturers of Transvaginal Mesh
Major part of the manufacturing of transvaginal mesh implants are being undertaken by four leading companies namely:
- Johnson & Johnson
- C. R. Bard
- American Medical Systems
- Boston Scientific
Negative Publicity in Recent Times
Most recently, the transvaginal mesh implants were publicized throughout the word for their dangers. The females and the physiologists were cautioned with regards to the potential side effects that would be caused by the usage of these surgical devices, which might be very serious. However, it is noted that US Food and Drug Administration have issued no re-call. Moreover, the manufacturing companies did not take off the products from the markets also. Hence, it is important for everyone to be aware of the adverse side effects that could be caused by the usage of the transvaginal mesh. The users would be required to consult their doctors if any odd symptoms were exhibited.
Problems Associated with Transvaginal Mesh
Though the manufacturers of the transvaginal mesh are saying that these medical devices are safer, it is being told by different surgeons that these implants are to be used in less numbers. In addition to this, it is said that these implants are to be used only by the physicians who are well trained that too over a less number of female patients who are chosen very specifically. These patients should be holding the propensity for surgeries that could be successful.
It could be observed that the patients were claiming that the surgeries for implanting the transvaginal meshes have resulted in the internal injuries. There exists several numbers of lawsuits that were being filed against the manufacturers of transvaginal mesh implants. Starting from the year 2005 until the year 2007, US Food and Drug Administration noted over 1000 adverse reports for the transvaginal mesh.
More than 2800 reports of complications that were being associated with the use of transvaginal mesh implants used for treating the conditions of pelvic organ prolapse and the stress urinary incontinence have been received by FDA during the period of 2 years starting from 1st of January in the year 2008 ending at 31st of December in the year 2010. In the month of July in the year 2011, Food and Drug Administration issued two safety alerts for the surgical transvaginal meshes. One of those two alerts was given for POP and SUI while the other alert was given for hernia repair.
It has been pointed out by the FDA that it is not clear whether repairs using transvaginal mesh implants for pelvic organ prolapse is efficient than the other repairs that are making use of the non-mesh. Moreover, the transvaginal meshes might be exposing greater risk to the recipients.
Transvaginal Mesh History
The Transvaginal mesh was first developed in 1950s from polypropylene. This is a thermoplastic polymer resin made of propylene and petroleum. Polypropylene was chosen for this because it can be molded into many structures, fibers that are made for the suture material is a good example of this Polypropylene product. In addition to this polypropylene quaternary ammonium biocides are used that serves as a disinfectant and kills the germs because they tend to damage the proteins and the cell membranes and this has the chance of developing the post surgical infections, however this is not effective against Pseudomonas species.
Polypropylene knitted Mesh (PPKM) is a kind of fabric that comprised of monofilament yarns that are engineered to make the textile fabrics. These fibers and meshes are prepared in the same way in which the surgical devices are manufactured i.e., aseptically in order to avoid the chance of microbial infections. There are several kinds of mesh patches: some of them are hernia mesh patches, stress urinary incontinence slings (SUI) and vaginal prolapse suspenders. In some conditions nonwoven polypropylene fabrics are used.
However, several complications are developed in the patients who are operated with this mesh patches. Most of them suffered from microbial infections, pain, urinary problems and bowel, bladder or blood- vessel perforations, conditions recurred even after a second surgery. Removal of mesh is also another problem where it is needed to be operated out due to the vaginal erosion. A popular mentor sling type mesh product made by Mentor Corporation was known as transobturator vaginal sling which is commonly known as OB Tape. Treatments for the side effects of these transvaginal illnesses include blood transfusions, further surgery, drainage of abscesses, intravenous hydration and so on. A recent study in one of the medical journals revealed about the serious side effects associated with the usage of these meshes. The study has compared transvaginal mesh with colporrhaphy, which is the conventional surgical treatment followed to strengthen vaginal tissue and take care of the pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
Questions about transvaginal mesh patch implant
Because of the fact that transvaginal mesh implant and issues surrounding it are relatively new, there are more of questions to answer, so as to get the people clarified about the conditions present in the now and the ways of going about some things. Here, we are going to answer some of the most pressing questions on the issue of transvaginal mesh patch implant.
Transvaginal mesh patch implant has been used in the past to get people treated against cases of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, resulting from pregnancy effects, and the fact still remains that there are so many people that got relief after the treatments. But majority and in fact more than 90 percent of the people who got this treatment have experienced a lot of complications that are due to the aftermath of the surgery, and these ranges from having problems with their urinary organs, bladder, urethra and even having serious pains during sexual intercourse. When the food and drug administration agency in the US came out to give the warning that these complications complained about are real, many people took to the courts to get compensation for these felt injuries to their body as occasioned by the transvaginal mesh patch implant.
But those who had their own transvaginal mesh device implanted into them through the abdomen are now asking whether they are also eligible to file the suit and get compensations. The truth here is that whenever you undergo any surgery in US and other states, and you eventually discover that the experienced complications are due to the fact that the surgery was badly performed, or that bad equipments was used on you, you have the right to take up legal action. But on the particular case of transvaginal mesh implanted through the abdomen, there have not been cases of the abdominal implant being problematic. In fact, it is seen as the safest way of implanting it, but due to the fact that it will imply longer recovery time, the manufacturers abandoned it and went for the perceived faster transvaginal implant. The argument against them is that they marketed these products when they knew the products were not fit for vaginal implantation. In as much as the only people that have viable claims on this issue are those that received the vaginal implant, you can also get a very thorough assessment from your physician, so as to know if there are any damages or complications that warrants a lawsuit against the manufacturers of the mesh used on you.
Another question asked by people is the reason why the transvaginal mesh implant is so defective. The simple reason for this is that the meshes were not manufactured properly by the manufacturers. They did not use the required materials to produce the mesh. The findings are that they used materials that bring about some level of immunosuppressant response from the body of the victims, and the result of this is that the tissues are not allowed to grow into the mesh. The mesh comes with either too large or too small pores and this inhibits the growth of the tissues.
If your own self or your loved one had been treated for stress urinary incontinence or something more similar, the pelvic organ prolapse with a surgery that had involved the placement of transvaginal surgical mesh, then you might be at risk of developing some serious medical complications.
A Transvaginal mesh patch is a bio medical device that is implanted to human females surgically, surgically implanted device that stretches across the vaginal wall (also known as the pelvic floor) to add extra support to tissues damaged during an injury, childbirth and/or surgery. The mesh is placed all along the vaginal wall to safe guard the area and is manufactured and designed to be left permanently inside the body. These painful conditions can be however corrected through surgeries, but in almost many cases, the mesh which is used in the surgery to avoid the problems has ended up in painful injuries for patients.
It is generally estimated that the women in most of the developed nations have suffered some of the serious injuries and difficulties following the surgical procedures in the contemporary periods, there by prompting the United States Food and Drug Administration to organize awareness with the help of a public advisory for about nine brands of the popular selling surgical mesh.
The human females who were injured because of the usage of the transvaginal surgical mesh patch in surgeries to correct the damage that is caused due to the stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse are told to have rights to ask for a financial compensation. The complications that are commonly associated with this category of the surgical product include infection, perforation of the bowel, blood vessels and bladder, pain in the lower abdomen and other related medical ailments.
Surgeons generally use these surgical meshes in procedures to treat the conditions mentioned earlier. By using this mesh to strengthen the internal organs and to prevent the organs from coming in contact with each other, a surgeon might be able to reduce the pain and other related symptoms. However, many women have found too much of problems including suffering painful injuries as a result of the use of transvaginal placement of surgical mesh. In many cases, surgeons were in a position to perform additional procedures to remove the mesh due to the allergic responses.
The Painful Bowel and Bladder Perforations are found to be very persistent among the Common Surgical Mesh Injuries. The post surgical and surgical injuries can result in severe pain, several urinary problems, and other related complications. It was observed that in several cases, extra surgeries are needed to take out the mesh so as to correct the problems.
No one can take a mesh from Company A and put it across the contaminated vagina of a human female and implant it under the bladder. Also we can’t expect not to get a rejection or an abscess. There are quite a lot much of the FDA’s time exhausted on thinking that one mesh will suit or the other will not! Generally people do not understand the basic science of these foreign bodies. Injuries from surgical mesh patch can very well lead to serious and life-threatening complications. Hence, it is important for everyone to understand their rights and must claim for that.
The issues surrounding the recall of some of the transvaginal mesh devices in the market has been a very big debate in many quarters in the US in particular. When the masses noticed that the effects of these mesh implants in women is becoming more harmful than beneficial, there was a lot of outcries on the issue. But the masses can only make outcries and protests. This went on in different quarters and drew the attention of the food and drug administration agency in the US. As the agency that is saddled with the responsibility of taking care of the food and drugs that are thrown into the market, and making sure they are of the required standard, they convoked a meeting of medical experts.
After several findings in2008, this same agency came out to issue a warning to the public about the potential danger that is associated with the use of these devices, and the problems that is harbored by the current devices in the market. This triggered a lot of joy among the people who have been suffering the after effects of these meshes, and the next action that many of them took was to seek legal action against all these firms. however, the issue of legal action came when the FDA made it clear that the main problems with the mesh is due to manufacturer’s defects that resulted in the mesh not being finished with the most appropriate materials.
While these issues especially the court cases kept going on, the people started pushing for further action against the manufacturers of these meshes, and the next demands was that all the meshes in the market should be recalled by the agency. This led the agency to once again mandate their advisory panel to set up a committee to look into this. In line with this mandate, the committee set up a 15 person panel to look into the case properly with a view to see if a total recall is the best option to use, or the next action to take.
Now, during the panel meetings, one thing that everybody noticed was that the panel members were met by a completely frustrated set of doctors that are very angry about the effects of the transvaginal mesh implant on their patients. These are people who witnessed these patients on firsthand basis. But, after the whole meetings, the panel instead of recommending a complete recall as all expected, went ahead to consider the reclassification of the procedure and the device as a class 3 device. The result of this is that it is now classified as one of the devices that will require very rigorous premarket testing, before it could ever be distributed generally.
This was followed by an order issued to all the manufacturers of these meshes to make sure they conduct proper safety reviews of all their products before selling them to the public. This is to be done on both the products that are presently in the market and intended new ones.
But this did not go down well with the masses that are agitating for a complete transvaginal mesh patch recall. They went on with their protests and demonstrations, and in January 2012, the FDA issued another set of post market surveillance orders, which was branded 522. This order to all the manufacturers of the transvaginal mesh saw many of the manufacturers gradually withdraw their products from the market.
General Information on the transvaginal mesh patch issue
If you are not familiar with the issue of the transvaginal mesh patch, and what it is all about, you are better off reading this piece with a very rapt attention. This will give you the basics on this and the issue surrounding it. Now, there are two health conditions that are suffered by women. These two health conditions or illnesses are the stress urinary incontinence, and its brother called pelvic organ relapse. The stress urinary incontinence is a condition that mostly occurs in women due to the weakness of the muscles that surrounds the female pelvis. This weakness is mostly caused by problems experienced during pregnancy and childbirth. Now, the problem with this condition is that due to the weakness witnessed in the pelvic organ, it allows the urethra to leak urine involuntarily from the body. The result of this is that during those regular daily activities like coughing, sneezing, laughing, exercising and others that involve little stress, the witnessed weakness will allow urine to leak from the body of the women involuntarily. This is also witnessed in men, but it is easily treated.
The next condition is the pelvic organ prolapse, which normally occurs in elderly women. Here, the women suffer some weakness in the muscles and tissues that surrounds the bladder and uterus. This results in these organs shifting from where they are supposed to be, and causing problems to other organs of the body.
Now, in order to give a solution to these problems, the doctors in the US developed a program called the transvaginal mesh patch. Here, they tend to use mesh to strengthen these internal organs that have been weakened in the body. The surgery is meant to keep these organs in place and prevent them from affecting others and preventing them from performing their functions. They are separated with the mesh so that they do not come in contact with each other again. In most cases, this mesh is placed around the wall of the vagina on permanent basis, while in other cases; another surgery is done to remove them.
The surgery has used to correct the problem for a very long time, and it was discovered that it reduced pain and other symptoms in some women. But as time went on, reports of complications caused by this surgery started coming in. Many people complained of scarring, which caused them serious discomfort, pain, infections and urinary problems. Others complained of general reduction in the level of estrogen in their body and the quality of their life. This is as a result of the scars, the shape and size of the mesh placed in their body, and the technique used to place it.
Because of the aforementioned factors, the FDA came out in 2008 and gave a warning that there are lots of risks associated with the surgery. They also posited that surgeons must receive more training on the best ways of performing the surgery and should give proper explanation to the patients about the risk involved in the surgery before any session. According to them, more than 1000 women have reported such complications.
But the latest is that nonprofit organizations and a lot of women advocacy groups have taken it upon themselves to encourage women who have complications and negative health issues coming from the transvaginal mesh patch surgery to take up legal actions against the manufacturers of the mesh used on them. Many have taken to this and received compensations and settlements after winning the court cases.
Recorded cases of transvaginal mesh patch recall
Following the overwhelming spate of demonstrations and calls on the FDA to issue an order to all the manufacturers of mesh implants to recall their products, many of the mesh manufacturers started doing this out of their discretion. The FDA never gave such orders. It only issued orders on tests, and proper information before it will be used. But when these orders came in form of order 555, many of the manufacturers of these products found it necessary to take the action of recalling their products even without an explicit order on that. However, most of these recalls came even year before the FDA delved into the matter, giving an impression that these firms had a prior idea about the dangers associated with their products. Below is the history of the recalls done so far?
The first mesh to be ever manufactured and used in the US is that produced by the Boston Scientific. Boston Scientifics’ ProtoGen came into the market a long time ago, before other transvaginal mesh joined it a year later. However, in 1999, the company out of their own volition recalled all their products in the market. At that time, there was no reason given for this recall. But own significant thing to note here is that this ProtoGen was the template that almost all the other meshes in the market followed. There is a rule in the laws of the FDA that when you manufacture a new product that has proper similarity with an existing product, you do not need to do another set of human testing before throwing this into the market. And since all these other meshes coming after the ProtoGen were developed similar to the ProtoGen, they were granted automatic access into the market without human testing. But when ProtoGen was recalled in 1999, questions started arising.
The next was the mesh produced by Mentor Corporation. This is perhaps the mesh that enjoyed the shortest life span in the market. This mesh which was named ObTape Vaginal Sling is a bladder sling that was introduced in 2003, but was recalled in 2006. The main reason why it was recalled by the manufacturers is because its users experienced a recurrent sort of vaginal erosion. This erosion was caused because it was manufactured with products that are deemed too dense. They never allowed the growth of tissues and capillaries, and were rejected by the body. However, it is good to note that before this product was recalled from the market, it has already been used by more than 35,000 women.
The next in the line is Ethicon, which was manufactured by Johnson and Johnson. This came in June 2012. They stopped selling all four of their Gyecare mesh products. But this is after they were involved in a lawsuit that was instituted by 600 women against their mesh. Because of this, they recalled Prolift Kit, Prolift + M Kit, TVT Secur, and Prosima Pelvic Floor Repair System Kit.
However, it is also good to know that Ethicon did not recall all its products. It continued the sale of Gynecare Gynemesh, but restricted this to be used for only abdominal implantations. Again, it never recalled the sold or implanted meshes. It only stopped selling new ones.
Transvaginal mesh patch is a device that is incorporated permanently in women who are affected by vaginal tissue damage during their child birth, injury and surgery. It was reported that most of the patients who were operated with the Transvaginal mesh patch were found have several complications like erosion of vaginal epithelium, severe bleeding, serious infection Prolapse of pelvic region, urinary incontinence, continuous pain, change in the quality of life and a potential threat for life in most of the cases. Women who are affected by this device can able to file a lawsuit against its manufacturers. On October 2008, Food and Drug administration in U.S warned the doctors and the patients about the complications in using the Transvaginal mesh patches in Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence conditions. FDA also suggested the physicians to undergo a special training for handling the mesh patch operations with great concern. Most importantly the patient must be acknowledged about the complications involved in the mesh patch device and they should be periodically observed and their complication must be treated effectively.
The most common complications were reported to be vaginal tissues’ infection, intolerable pain, urinary problems and recurrence of prolapse and incontinence. These severe complications can lead to major reduction in patient quality of life because of the discomfort pain and dyspareunia. A case study reported on May 2012, in which a Colorado women filed a lawsuit against American Medical systems claiming that the product from the former company have caused numerous permanent ailments, which forced her to undergo multiple operations that did not help but left her with the pain. She reported with her law firm and it was informed that the woman had implemented with the American Medical systems’ Perigee system with InteXen LP and the Apogee system with IntenXen LP. The Food and Drug Administration of U.S “A number of proceedings have been reported to the FDA for the surgical mesh devices used to repair POP and stress urinary incontinence for the previous 3 year period was over 1,000. Though, it is a common ailment that affects the patients reporting to increase following a FDA safety communication, the agency is alarmed that the number of adverse event reports remains high”.
It is also observed that the traditional non-mesh methods known as colporrhaphy which involves the treatment of fixing connective tissues in the vaginal wall back together, that is quite effective in most of the cases and the patients can go for this due to less pain and side effects. Thousands of lawsuits have been filed against C.R. Bard, Johnson and Johnson and other manufacturers. Patients who are affected by this device can file a law suit against the respective company and can demand a certain amount of cash to equal the loss. The patients demand may include the cost of the device, surgery etc. If you or your loved one underwent this surgery involving the transvaginal mesh patch and have suffered by problems with the device, you are of course eligible to file a lawsuit and receive a settlement for your injuries. So know your rights and fight for it!
Types of transvaginal mesh patch lawsuit
Issues of transvaginal mesh patch lawsuit are one that many people have not gotten enough information about, and to that effect, they need more enlightening on these issues. There are different types of transvaginal mesh part lawsuits that people undertake or file, especially when it comes to the US where these cases are very predominant. But the two most prevalent types are the class action lawsuit and the personal injury lawsuit. The class action lawsuit is used to describe the type of lawsuit where the attorney in question is addressing the interest of the entire group that was involved in the case. Here, he files the case to prove that the manufacturers of the mesh did not take the safety of the people into consideration when they were manufacturing the product used for the surgery. The argument is that they did not hold up their duty over the people to insure they provide products that are safe for the consumption of the people.
When it comes to the personal injury case, the argument is the same thing, but the only difference is that here, he or she is arguing the case of a single person and not for any group of people. Here, the lawsuit is focused on the individual’s personal experience after the surgery. the main objects of all lawsuits however, is to prove beyond doubts that either the manufacturers did not manufacture safe products for the consumption of the masses, or that they failed to give full information on the side, adverse or negative effects that the use of these products can cause. So, whichever transvaginal mesh patch lawsuit you want to file must either come under the personal injury case or argued in form of a class actions lawsuit
How to choose an attorney for transvaginal mesh patch lawsuit
Getting the right attorney to argue your case against any company for injuries resulting from transvaginal mesh implant is not an easy one. Whenever you stand up to do something, you must see that you complete it well. This is the reason why you should not waste your time with nonchalant attorneys that are not suitable for the case. If you need an attorney for the lawsuit involving transvaginal mesh patch, you need to choose one considering these facts. Not all lawyers approach the case with the same criteria. Some like clean and smooth cases that do not involve more than one mesh implant, other surgeries or complications. Others like it complicated and are able to go ahead with any type of case. You have to consider all these especially now that the issue itself is getting complicated, so as to avoid your case being rejected.
You have to choose the lawyer from a firm where all your concerns are answered in the shortest possible time. Their customer service must involve the three systems of the toll free line, the instant messaging and email box. All these must be working 24 hours of the day. Ask questions before you choose. Know who your contact person in the firm will be. Ask whether the lawyer handling your case is experienced with such cases and know the level of the experience. You also need to know whether the case will stay with them or whether you will be referred to another firm in the future. Other thing you should ask is whether you can switch if you are not treated well by the staff of the lawyer and whether there will be any financial loss if you do so.
Limitations to transvaginal mesh patch lawsuit
A lot have been said about transvaginal mesh lawsuit and many people are now ready to take advantage of the condition to get them some compensation for a complete life damage that has been brought about by some level of negligence. But the truth about it is that filing a transvaginal mesh patch lawsuit might not be as simple as it seems. This is the reason why you must get advice from your surgeon and the attorney before you can go ahead with the lawsuit. However, before we go into the limitations, we have to consider some of the conditions you must meet before you file the suit. There are some rules that guide the lawsuit, which you need to be abreast with.
The first condition is that before you ever think of going for the lawsuit, yourself, your wife, sister, mother, or any relative must have received a transvaginal mesh patch from a recognized surgeon. The surgery must have given you complications, pains and medical negative conditions that are medically verifiable. There must be medical verifications for your claims, and this must be attested to by a medical personnel. The third is that you must be filing for yourself or on behalf of a relative, and in the case where the relative is alive, she must be aware of the suit and she must give her approval.
The next and most important rule about this is the rule of duration and the time frame to file the suit. There are limitations to the time limit for which you can file the lawsuit. However, the time frame we are talking about starts counting from the day you underwent the surgery. In democratic nations like the US where each state has legal autonomy, it varies from state to state. The generally accepted number of years for most of the states is between one and six years. But due to some peculiarities, some of the states might allow up to 10 years time limit for which you are entitled to file a suit. However, for you to qualify for hearing or any compensation that might result from the suit, you must file within this time frame. But some other things involved in the matter is that if the actual person cannot file the suit, his or her relatives can go ahead with it. For example, in a case where the women that suffered the case have died, probably due to the complications, the husband has the right to file the case.
When you want to file the lawsuit, you can simply walk to any of the attorneys that are versatile with the issues involved in it. However, there are numerous attorneys that have dedicated themselves to the act of undertaking such lawsuits and making sure you get the best from such. You are better off filing through these attorneys. This is because they have gone into the intricacies involved in the suit and knows how to give you the best. You will be required to fill out a form where you give your name, phone number, email addresses, city, state, zip code, and the symptoms you have been suffering since after the surgery. The surgeon that performed the surgery on you, and the manufacturers of the mesh that was used on you is also given. If out of ignorance you do not have the last information, you have to contact your surgeon and get this from him or her.
Examples of transvaginal mesh patch lawsuit
The issue of transvaginal mesh is a complicated one. The truth about it is that the manufacturers of these meshes set out to solve one of the most gruesome problems experienced by the women folk. But due to some sort of negligence, this led them into more problems than it has solved. Now, there are lots of lawsuits established against these manufacturers. These lawsuits are mainly cases of personal injury filed by people that believes they now suffer a lot of problems due to the implant they received. The number of transvaginal mesh patch lawsuits in the US where it is prevalently used has risen to the extent that a single state is said to have up to 500 pending lawsuits. This attests to the level of problem this has brought about.
One of the victims of this goes by the name Scott. She is 33, and in her own case, she complained that she was implanted with a Bard Avaulta Plus mesh in 2008 and this treatment was meant to put a stop to some urinary incontinence that she experienced. But the problem that brought her to the court of law is that she is now suffering from consistent and chronic pain in her vagina, and this pain no longer allows her to have intercourse with her husband, as this has become so painful.
It was only in November 2008 that she got the information that the FDA has issued some warning on the possible problems with the transvaginal mesh implant, and this made her to file the lawsuit in January 2009. While testifying in the law court, she posited that she has not been able to urinate normally for the past six months and that she could only pass out urine with the help of catheter. Other problems that she witnessed are that the bard mesh used on her has protruded through and into her vagina. It also broke into pieces and eroded into her body. It has also intertwined with some of her pelvic organs and tissues. All these make intercourse very impossible for her. The result is that she also experienced lacerations, infections and abscesses. This even got to the extent that she needed a psychologist to help her with the psychological damage, and the psychologist also testified that she will need the therapy all through her life, to be able to live with the condition. After hearing her case, a compensation of $5.5 million was awarded to her by the law court.
Another victim of the transvaginal mesh implant complication had her engagement called off by her fiancé because of the fact that they cannot have sex without pains since after the surgery. She said she understands her partner because it is not his fault. For her, the result of the whole issue has made her life a downward spiral in all ramifications. She said that she has had chronic pelvic pain and some sort of recurring bladder infections. She said that this has also led her to gain some weight, and she now suffers some level of depression. For her, the worst part is that she is now down financially, and this is because of the fact that she is taking many days off from work, so as to undergo tests and some lab work and in the bid to find the appropriate doctor to treat her. She also has a pending transvaginal mesh patch lawsuit.